Private Equity Funds in Renewable Energy

ntroduction

There are two main purposes of this article. The first purpose is to discuss a private equity company involved in making investments in renewable energy sector. And the second aim of this article is to discuss the investment of other private equity houses on renewable energy sector. We will discuss this issue in accordance with Daniel Schafer’s article ‘Winds of Change’. The company selected to fulfill the purpose of this article is HgCapital. HgCapital is a private equity firm who is engaged in buying out of small, medium and large size companies all over Europe.

The firm makes investment in all sorts of industries but it has a specialized fund for renewable energy. It invests in five sectors: Industrials, Health care, TMT, Services and Renewable energy. The company was established in 1985 by the name of Mercury Private Equity. It is headquartered in London, United Kingdom. HgCapital has total assets of around $5.2 Billion. It has 80 Employees in its offices in Germany and United Kingdom.

Discussion

HgCapital was the first UK Private Equity fund that involved in investing in renewable energy sector. Today HgCapital is considered to be the largest renewable fund player in Europe in terms of the amount of capital it raised. It established its first renewable energy investment team in 2004 and made its first investment in 2006 after a thorough research of the sector. The Team initially invested in utility renewable project in Western Europe through technologies such as solar, hydro, and onshore wind. For that purpose the company uses ‘fund investment approach for infrastructures’. The company focuses on small hydro and wind projects which are independent of government support. In Scandinavia, the company has become the major owner and player of onshore wind farms.

The renewable energy market is the rapid and fastest growing segment in Europe. It is a potential investment opportunity for the investors. It requires considerable capital investment. Economies of scale and advancement in technology have increased the cost competitiveness of the sector. As a response to these market drivers the company has increased its focus on the use of efficient and effective technologies and the best possible resource sites. This results in lower cost to consumers. In order to establish strategic value and to lower the intrinsic cost the company has decided to invest in industrial scale.

The article by Daniel Schafer’s ‘Winds of Change’ emphasized on the growing interest of private equity funds investment in renewable energy sector. According to the author, Daniel, KKR and Blackstone like HgCapital have discovered a new investment opportunity. As mentioned earlier renewable energy is the fastest growing sector in Europe. Hence it provides attractive and potential investment opportunities for many of the private equity funds. There were overall 70 renewable energy investments by private equity funds in between 2004 and 2006. However the number increased to 170 Investment during 2008.

There has been a lot of activity during this year. KKR, which is a United States based private equity fund, made its first investment in the renewable sector. The very same day Axa Private Equity becomes the fourth largest wind farm operator in France. After a month, another UK based private equity firm by the name of Bridgepoint, invested a sum in wind farms of Spain. In August the same year, Blackstone, rival of KKR invested €2.5 billion for constructing Germany two offshore wind farms.

According to the author one major reason why the renewable sector is a hot spot for investment is because it is immune and least affected by economic cycles. Wind and solar energy does not bear the same demand risk as gas, coal and nuclear power. Even banks are willing to lend for making investments in renewable projects. Renewable energy has become the major power generation. Solar energy is in number second but still behind in terms of cost. In future the author believes that further investment will made for the supply chain of that sector.

Conclusion

The article discusses a private equity company involved in making investments in renewable energy sector. The company selected for this purpose is HgCapital. The firm makes investment in all sorts of industries but it has a specialized fund for renewable energy. It established its first renewable investment team in 2004 and made its first investment in 2006 after a thorough research of the sector.

The article also discusses Daniel Schafer’s article ‘Winds of Change’. The article is focused on the investment of private equity houses on renewable energy sector. The private equity houses discussed in this article are KKR, Black stone, Axa, and Bridgestone. Renewable energy is the fastest growing sector in Europe. Hence it provides attractive and potential investment opportunities for many of the private equity funds. According to author, one major reason why renewable energy sector is a hot spot for investment is because it is immune and least affected by economic cycles. Being the fastest growing sector in Europe it provides an attractive and potential investment opportunity to private equity fund managers and companies.

Creative Home Equity Strategies For Retirement

The outlook is not entirely bleak, however. One bright spot that may help Baby-Boomers achieve secure a retirement is the record high-level of home ownership and the related growth in home equity. Home equity, the difference between debt owed on a home loan and the value of a home, accounts for at least fifty percent of net wealth for more than half of all U.S. households according to the Survey of Consumer Finance. In much of the country, historically low interest rates have spurred refinancings and kept housing markets strong, both factors in boosting home equity growth.

Unfortunately, too many homeowners tap into home equity savings through cash-out refinancings, second-mortgage home equity loans, or home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) to pay for vacations, new cars, and other current consumption expenses producing no long-term wealth appreciation. These homeowners may be seriously eroding their ability to finance retirement. By cashing out home equity now, they are spending what has been a vital cushion in old age for past generations.

Homeowners who manage their home equity prudently, on the other hand, will enter retirement years with a substantial nest-egg to complement their other retirement savings accounts. This article describes seven specific ways in which the home equity nest-egg can be used to enhance retirement income planning.

1. Downsize – The traditional way to tap home equity in retirement is simply to move to a less expensive dwelling. The strategy is straight forward: sell your home for $250,000, replace it with one costing $150,000 and you’ve freed up $100,000. Within IRS guidelines, you can now sell your home and realize up to $250,000 in tax-free profits if you’re single; $500,000 if married.

This strategy makes even more sense when you consider that maintenance costs and the headaches of a large family-home are done away with for the retiree. Yet emotional attachment to a home is strong and we all know retirees who simply refuse to move from the home they have lived in for so many years.

2. Reverse Mortgage – Retirees remaining in their homes can still tap their home equity as a source of retirement income. An entire industry has grown up around the “reverse mortgage” concept which allows seniors over 62 to tap into their home’s value without making any repayments during their lifetime. A reverse mortgage (also known as a HECM – Home Equity Conversion Mortgage) requires no monthly payment. The payment stream is “reversed”: instead of making monthly payments to a lender, a lender makes payments to you, typically for the remainder of your life, if you continue to reside in the home.

Origination fees and closing costs for reverse mortgages are high. Some people try to avoid these fees by instead borrowing against their home equity for retirement living expenses with a regular home equity loan or home equity line of credit (HELOC). However, this is not always a smart strategy. The reason is that with either a conventional home equity loan or a HELOC loan, you will have to make regular monthly payments that may be at a higher interest rate than can be earned on the loan proceeds without undue risk. Also, if you use loan proceeds to pay for routine living expenses, you risk running out of money. A HECM, on the other hand, can be structured to provides income for the rest of your life.

There are many pros and cons to reverse mortgages and a complete discussion is beyond the scope of this article. Suffice it to say that the reverse mortgage strategy is a sound one for many retirees. As with any major financial decision, it is essential that you seek qualified advice before committing to any particular deal. Federal guidelines, in fact, require reverse mortgage applicants to participate in counseling sessions prior to taking out a loan.

3. Purchase Service Years – One of the lesser known facts of financial life is that many public and some corporate pension plans allow their employees to purchase additional years of service credit – sometimes at bargain prices. For example, for an up front lump-sum payment a teacher with 20 years service might be eligible to buy 5 additional years and thereby qualify to retire early.

The cost of buying service years can vary greatly from plan to plan. A dwindling number of pension plans require only a fixed dollar payment for each service year purchased regardless of age; however, most plans now have an actuary compute the cost based upon the employee’s age, income and other variables. In either case, it is worthwhile to learn about these options. Although up front costs are steep, you may find that financing the purchase of service years through a home equity loan or HELOC is a sound investment. Bear in mind you are looking at the purchase of an annuity: in exchange for an up front lump-sum payment, you are promised a steady stream of future payments. As with any major financial decision, always seek qualified financial advice.

Also, inquire about other non-pension benefits you may qualify for by purchasing additional service credits. For example, some employers base retiree health care benefits on the number of years of service. Purchasing additional service credits may qualify you for valuable benefits you might not otherwise be eligible for.

4. Company Match – According to the Investment Company Institute, 75.5% of companies match their employees’ 401k plan contributions. The most common match level is $.50 per $1.00 employee contribution up to the first 6% of pay. Yet despite the “free money” allure of company matches, a surprisingly large number of workers do not participate in their companies’ 401k program or do not contribute enough to receive the full employer match.

Workers electing not to join their employers’ 401k plans cite financial constraints as the primary reason. Yet the long-term financial impact of non-participation will likely be far more significant than the short-term discomfort of re-arranging budget priorities. Not only do non-participants miss an immediate and guaranteed 50% return on their investment, they also lose time and the benefit of compounding on their retirement savings growth.

In the right circumstances it can be a sensible to borrow from a home equity line of credit (HELOC) to fully fund a 401k. This strategy involves moving funds from one savings category (home equity) to another (retirement savings) and makes most sense if: 1) the employer match is significant, 2) HELOC interest rates are relatively low, 3) the loan can be repaid in a relatively short period either from higher expected income and/or adjusting budget priorities and, 4) the participant commits to adjusting lifestyles and priorities so that future 401k contributions are made from current income.

Another consideration is whether itemized deductions (including mortgage interest) fall above the IRS standard deduction amount ($9,700 for couples in 2004). Many long-time homeowners are at the tail end of their loan amortization meaning that nearly all of their monthly payments go towards principal. For instance, during the last five years of a typical 30-year mortgage, only about 14% of the total payments will be interest payments. This means little or no tax deduction benefit is being realized – one of the principal benefits of home ownership. In such cases, additional home equity borrowing (or refinancing) may result in tax savings to offset investment risks.

5. Avoid 401k Loans – One popular features of many 401k plans is the ability to borrow from your vested balance for purposes such as a car purchase, educational expenses, or a home purchase or improvements. More than half of all 401k plans offer the loan option, typically allowing loans up to 50% of the vested account balance or $50,000, whichever is less.

Many people take out 401k loans believing they are better off because they will be “pay interest to themselves” rather than a bank. But the truth is that a 401k loan isn’t really a loan at all; rather, you are spending down your own hard-won retirement savings. And the interest you pay to yourself won’t come close to replacing the interest lost by not having the funds invested in retirement account assets.

The bottom line is that 401k loans are almost never a wise financial move and even less so for homeowners having the option to borrow against home equity instead. Among other advantages, interest paid on home equity loans is generally tax-deductible whereas interest on a 401k loan is not.

6. Borrow to Fund IRA Before April 15 Deadline – Financial planners generally agree that it is best to either: 1) make contributions to an IRA as soon as possible (e.g. January 1) to maximize the power of compounding or, 2) make steady equal contributions throughout the tax year to gain the benefits of “income-averaging”. Yet many people find themselves up against the April 15th tax deadline without adequate cash and, so, fail to make any IRA contribution for that tax year. In some cases, people miss the opportunity even though they are in line to receive a substantial tax refund within weeks.

Unfortunately, when the deadline passes, the opportunity to make an IRA contribution for that year is lost. The foregone compounded impact on retirement savings can be huge. Consider that a 35-year old who misses a $3,000 IRA contribution will have $30,000 (assuming 8% return) less in his retirement account at age 65. It is sensible, in many situations, to use a HELOC loan to finance an IRA contribution rather than miss the opportunity forever. The case for borrowing to fund an IRA is particularly strong if the loan can be repaid quickly with a tax refund.

7. Take Advantage of IRS “Catch-Up” Rules – Congress created “catch-up” provisions to give older workers nearing retirement an additional tool to bolster retirement savings. In a nutshell, catch-up provisions for the various tax-advantaged retirement programs (i.e. IRA, 401k, 403b, 457, etc.) permit workers to make supplemental (“catch-up”) contributions starting in the year the worker turns age 50. The amount of allowable annual catch-up varies by the type of retirement program and is summarized in this table.

If, for example, you are 55 and plan to sell your house when you retire at 62, it may be worthwhile to borrow on your HELOC today to catch-up on funding your retirement account. HELOCs generally allow for interest-only payments for several years meaning you will have to pay relatively low, tax-deductible interest until the house is sold and you are able to pay the principal balance. Again, with this strategy, you transfer funds from one savings category (home equity) to another savings category (tax-advantaged retirement account) to gain the advantage of higher-yield retirement account investments compounded for a longer period.